vdl68 wrote
Get back to the real life! It is not feasible and security reason NOT TO HAVE TWO bluetooth conection @the same time. If there was a way, then both speaker will still play both the left and right signal, IE the right speaker will still process both the right and left signal.Think about it a little bit more! lol....
you only need 2 separate bluetooth-transmitters in one box. that's the trick. if there was such a (fictive) bluetooth dongle which allowed to transmit the same signal to two different bluetooth receivers at the same time, it could in the same way be adjustable to splits both stereo-channels in the same way. but no such external dongle exists, therefore it is all speculation.
technically i see no reason why it shouldn't work as there are enough speakers that already work that way.
you maybe know the parrot zikmu wireless speakers. they act like a wireless stereo-system. they are 2 separate speakers with no interconnection between them. they can both receive audio through wlan or bluetooth or through a docked i-device, or even analog input. both communicate and sync through bluetooth. so if i connect with my iphone to one of the speakers, the other speaker automatically connects to the first and plays music in sync and in stereo.
also nokia's new play 360 is able to sync with another speaker and both act as a stereo-system then. it could have been possible with the jambox as well, if jawbone thought about this before. how much would such an additional transmitter-device cost, 20-30$ more...?
but now it is too late. the jambox will never be a wireless stereosystem. you have to look somewhere else. maybe even the new rumored bose ultraportable wireless speaker ("Bose Chihuahua") which is claimed to be a direct competitor to the the jawbone could do the trick. who knows? in some days we will know more about it.
